> as lemmas

1727 N. Lardner Credibility Gospel Hist. I. ix. 452 St. Luke..does not mention expressly any thing, which Paul did at Jerusalem, beside saluting the church:..he could not be more particular without an unnecessary repetition. Throw away this design, and St. Luke has been guilty of a very great omission.]

1875 E. W. Shalders tr. F. Godet Comm. Luke I. iii. 411 What..can be more readily imagined than the omission of one or the other of these cycles in any of these collections? An accident of this kind is sufficient to explain the great omission which we meet with in Luke.

1911 J. C. Hawkins in Stud. Synoptic Probl. 61 This well deserves its usual name of St. Luke's ‘great omission’.

1927 A. H. McNeile Introd. N.T. 26 Whether intentionally or not he [sc. St. Luke] omits [Mark] vi. 45–viii. 26, which is sometimes called the ‘Great Omission’.

2008 R. H. Stein Mark iv. 322 It is strange that the parallel in Luke does not mention this, since the praying of Jesus is a strong Lukan theological emphasis.., but this is part of his ‘great omission’ of the Markan material found in 6:45–8:26.