proferensn.

Brit.

/prəʊˈfɛrɛnz/, U.S.

/proʊˈfɛrɛnz/

Inflections: Plural proferentes Brit.

/ˌprəʊfɛˈrɛntiːz/, U.S.

/ˌproʊfəˈrɛnˌtiz/;

Origin: A borrowing from Latin. Etymons: Latin prōferēns, prōferre.

Etymology: < classical Latin prōferēns, present participle of prōferre profer v., after contra proferentem adv.

Law.

The party that proposes or adduces a contract, or a condition in a contract. Cf. contra proferentem adv.

ΘΚΠ

society > law > legal obligation > contract > [noun] > one who is party to > person who enters into contract

contrahent1524

contractor1548

party contractor1644

indenter1648

covenantor1649

contractant1875

proferens1928

1928 Law Jrnl. Rep.: Chancery Div. 7 Mar. 179 He who asserts a particular view of the exception is for this purpose in the position of ‘proferens’.

1935 Lloyd's List Law Rep. 9 May 306/1 In this case the underwriters were not the proferentes.

1974 E. R. H. Ivamy Marine Insurance (ed. 2) xxiii. 349 He saw no reason for coming to the conclusion that the insurers were the proferentes.

1997 Lloyd's List 8 Oct. 6 It is the insurers who are the proferentes in this case.

This entry has been updated (OED Third Edition, June 2007; most recently modified version published online March 2022).

单词	proferens
释义	proferensn. Brit. /prəʊˈfɛrɛnz/, U.S. /proʊˈfɛrɛnz/ Inflections: Plural proferentes Brit. /ˌprəʊfɛˈrɛntiːz/, U.S. /ˌproʊfəˈrɛnˌtiz/; Origin: A borrowing from Latin. Etymons: Latin prōferēns, prōferre. Etymology: < classical Latin prōferēns, present participle of prōferre profer v., after contra proferentem adv. Law. The party that proposes or adduces a contract, or a condition in a contract. Cf. contra proferentem adv. ΘΚΠ society > law > legal obligation > contract > [noun] > one who is party to > person who enters into contract contrahent1524 contractor1548 party contractor1644 indenter1648 covenantor1649 contractant1875 proferens1928 1928 Law Jrnl. Rep.: Chancery Div. 7 Mar. 179 He who asserts a particular view of the exception is for this purpose in the position of ‘proferens’. 1935 Lloyd's List Law Rep. 9 May 306/1 In this case the underwriters were not the proferentes. 1974 E. R. H. Ivamy Marine Insurance (ed. 2) xxiii. 349 He saw no reason for coming to the conclusion that the insurers were the proferentes. 1997 Lloyd's List 8 Oct. 6 It is the insurers who are the proferentes in this case. This entry has been updated (OED Third Edition, June 2007; most recently modified version published online March 2022). < n.1928
随便看	θ108726 θ108727 θ108728 θ108729 θ10873 θ108730 θ108731 θ108732 θ108733 θ108734 θ108735 θ108736 θ108737 θ108738 θ108739 θ10874 θ108740 θ108741 θ108742 θ108743 θ108744 θ108745 θ108746 θ108747 θ108748