释义 |
bribery
brib·er·y B0477600 (brī′bə-rē)n. pl. brib·er·ies The act or practice of offering, giving, or taking a bribe.bribery (ˈbraɪbərɪ) n, pl -eriesthe process of giving or taking bribesbrib•er•y (ˈbraɪ bə ri) n., pl. -er•ies. the act or practice of giving or accepting a bribe. [1350–1400; Middle English < Middle French] Bribery (See also EXTORTION, GRAFT, PLACATION.) blood money The price on someone’s head, the money paid as reward for incriminating evidence or betrayal, especially such as will result in another’s death. The term blood money also refers to the Anglo-Saxon wergild or compensation paid to the kin of a murder victim to prevent continued retaliatory feuding. cross [someone’s] palm To give money to someone, especially as a bribe; to grease someone’s palm or hand. Cross [someone’s] palm is not as common, nor as old, as grease [someone’s] palm, and its connotations not so strongly sinister. Cross probably refers to the action of placing bills across a person’s hand as a bribe is transacted. In another sense, it was customary to pay fortune tellers, especially gypsies, by crossing their palms (with silver), perhaps in a ritualized making of the sign of the cross to ward off prognostications of evil or merely for a lucky reading. glove money Bribe money; so-called from the gratuity or tip given to servants for the purpose of buying a pair of gloves; also glove-silver. Thomas F. Thiselton-Dyer offers this slightly different explanation of the expression in his book on folklore: The gift of a pair of gloves was at one time the ordinary perquisite of those who performed some small service; and in process of time, to make the reward of greater value, the glove was “lined” with money; hence the term “glove-money.” The term, no longer in current use, dates from the early 18th century. grease [someone’s] palm To bribe someone; to use money illegally for unauthorized services; sometimes grease the hand or fist. This slang phrase dates from the early 16th century. With gold and grotes they grease my hand. (John Skelton, Magnificence, 1526) Grease used figuratively means ‘to facilitate or smooth the way.’ In the case of bribery, one smooths the way by placing money in someone else’s hands. A variant of the full expression is the truncated grease. Current since the turn of the century is another variant oil [someone’s] palm. grease the wheels To take action to make things run smoothly; to use money as an expedient. In use since the 19th century, this expression does not necessarily connote financial deceit, although it clearly does so in the following citation: The party I mean is a glutton for money, but I will do my best with him. I think a hundred pounds … would grease his wheels. (Sir A. H. Elton, Below the Surface, 1857) have an ox on the tongue To be paid to remain silent; to be bribed to secrecy. This obsolete expression originated in ancient times, when cattle was considered an important commodity for barter; moreover, early metallic coins often bore the visage of an ox. Thus to have an ox on the tongue came to mean ‘made mute by money.’ oil of angels Money or gold, particularly when used as a gift or bribe. Angel in this expression refers to the 15th century English coin which bore the visage of Michael the Archangel. Figuratively, the phrase implies mat money provides soothing, oil-like relief to greedy hands. The palms of their hands so hot that they cannot be cooled unless they be rubbed with the oil of angels. (Robert Greene, A Quip from an Upstart Courtier, 1592) a sop to Cerberus A token intended to pacify another; a gift or tribute to appease an adversary; a bribe, hush-money. This expression is derived from the ancient Greek and Roman custom of placing a sop cake in the hands of a cadaver. The sop was intended to placate Cerberus, the three-headed dog that guarded the gates of Hades, who, after receiving the offering allowed the dead to pass. I will throw down a napoleon, as a sop to Cerberus. (Horatio Smith, Gaities and Gravities, 1825) ThesaurusNoun | 1. | bribery - the practice of offering something (usually money) in order to gain an illicit advantagegraftfelony - a serious crime (such as murder or arson)barratry - the crime of a judge whose judgment is influenced by briberycommercial bribery - bribery of a purchasing agent in order to induce the agent to enter into a transaction |
briberynoun corruption, graft (informal), inducement, buying off, payola (informal), crookedness (informal), palm-greasing (slang), subornation He was jailed on charges of bribery.Translationsbribe (braib) noun a gift offered to persuade a person to do something, usually dishonest. Policemen are not allowed to accept bribes. 賄賂 贿赂 verb to give (someone) a bribe. He bribed the guards to let him out of prison. 向...行賄 向...行贿ˈbribery noun 行賄 行贿Bribery
Bribery in Soviet criminal law, a concept incorporating three types of crimes: accepting a bribe (Criminal Code of the RSFSR, art. 173), giving a bribe (Criminal Code of the RSFSR, art. 174), and acting as an intermediary in bribery (Criminal Code of the RSFSR, art. 1741). Receiving a bribe is defined as the acceptance of any material valuables (objects or money) or the acquisition of any property benefit by an official in person or through intermediaries, in exchange for performing or not performing in the briber’s interest an action that the official must or could perform because of his position. The granting of non-material benefits is not considered a bribe. Among the circumstances legally recognized as aggravating responsibility in accepting a bribe are the responsible position held by the person who accepted the bribe; a previous conviction for bribery; the repeated acceptance of bribes; and extortion of the bribe. Accepting a bribe without aggravating circumstances is punishable by deprivation of freedom for a three- to ten-year term and confiscation of property. When there are aggravating circumstances, taking a bribe is punishable by deprivation of freedom for an eight- to 15-year term, with confiscation of property and with or without exile for two to five years. In cases with particularly aggravating circumstances, accepting a bribe is punishable by death and confiscation of property. Responsibility for taking a bribe is borne only by officials. A nonofficial’s acceptance of a property benefit for unlawful actions—for example, a conductor’s accepting money from a passenger for a ride without a ticket—is regarded as a property loss through deceit or abuse of trust. A person who poses as an official and receives property for actions that he can supposedly perform in the interests of the giver is called to account for fraud. Giving a bribe is defined as the transfer of material valuables or property benefits to an official for performing (or not performing) in the interests of the briber certain actions that take advantage of an official position. The repeated giving of a bribe or the giving of a bribe by a person previously convicted of bribery are considered aggravating circumstances. The giving of a bribe is punishable by deprivation of freedom for a three- to eight-year term; with aggravating circumstances, for a seven- to 15-year term, with or without confiscation of property and with or without exile from two to five years. In order to expose bribees—officials who have accepted bribes—Soviet law has established the instances in which bribers are exempt from criminal responsibility. Exemption from responsibility is possible if the»briber was blackmailed by the official or if he voluntarily disclosed this before it became known that a case of bribery was being investigated by state bodies. Acting as an intermediary in bribery is defined as performing actions aimed at transferring a bribe from one person to another—for example, the direct transfer of an item of bribery, the creation of conditions for such a transfer, and so forth. Acting as an intermediary in bribery is punishable by deprivation of freedom for a two- to eight-year term. When there are aggravating circumstances—for example, when there is a repeating offender or a person who was previously convicted of bribery and used his official position for bribery—acting as an intermediary is punishable by a seven-to 15-year term, with confiscation of property and with or without exile for two to five years. The commission of the above actions in the realm of activity of public organizations is equivalent to instances of bribery by employees in state institutions. Bribery is a disgraceful vestige of the past; it was widespread in the prerevolutionary Russian state apparatus. V. I. Lenin repeatedly pointed out the necessity for a resolute, hard struggle against bribery. The CPSU and the Soviet government consider the struggle against bribery one of the most important tasks of Soviet agencies fighting against crime. Bribery is widespread on an enormous scale in contemporary bourgeois states, especially the USA. N. A. STRUCHKOV BriberySee also Blackmail.Black Sox Scandalstar white Sox players sold out to gamblers (1919). [Am. Sports: Turkin, 478]Frollo, Claudeoffers to save Esmeralda if she will be his. [Fr. Lit.: The Hunchback of Notre Dame]Joel and Abiahintent on gain, pervert justice as Israel judges. [O.T.: I Samuel 8:2–3]Judas Iscariotbetrays Jesus for a bribe of thirty pieces of silver. [N.T.: Matthew 26:15]Maltese Falcon, Thethough he rejects large bribe, detective becomes involved in crime. [Am. Lit.: The Maltese Falcon, Magill I, 551–553]Menahempays off Assyrian king to avoid Israel. [O.T.: II Kings 15:20]mess of pottagehungry Esau sells birthright for broth. [O.T.: Genesis 25:29–34]Shemaiahsuborned to render false prophecy to Nehemiah. [O.T.: Nehemiah 6:10–14]Tweed Ringbribery is their essential method for corrupting officials (1860–1871). [Am. Hist.: Jameson, 511]Bribery
BriberyThe offering, giving, receiving, or soliciting of something of value for the purpose of influencing the action of an official in the discharge of his or her public or legal duties.The expectation of a particular voluntary action in return is what makes the difference between a bribe and a private demonstration of goodwill. To offer or provide payment in order to persuade someone with a responsibility to betray that responsibility is known as seeking Undue Influence over that person's actions. When someone with power seeks payment in exchange for certain actions, that person is said to be peddling influence. Regardless of who initiates the deal, either party to an act of bribery can be found guilty of the crime independently of the other. A bribe can consist of immediate cash or of personal favors, a promise of later payment, or anything else the recipient views as valuable. When the U.S. military threatened to cancel a Texas relocation company's contracts to move families to and from military bases, the company allegedly gave four representatives in Congress an all-expenses-paid weekend in Las Vegas in January 1989, and $2,500 in speaking fees. The former president of the company was indicted by a federal Grand Jury in 1994 on bribery charges for both gifts. No written agreement is necessary to prove the crime of bribery, but usually a prosecutor must show corrupt intent. Bribery charges may involve public officials or private individuals. In the world of professional sports, for example, one boxer might offer another a payoff to "throw" (deliberately lose) an important fight. In the corporate arena, a company could bribe employees of a rival company for recruitment services or other actions at odds with their employer's interests. Even when public officials are involved, a bribe does not need to be harmful to the public interest in order to be illegal. When a public official accepts a bribe, he or she creates a conflict of interest. That is, the official cannot accommodate the interests of another party without compromising the responsibilities of her or his position. There is not always consensus over what counts as a bribe. For instance, in many states and at the federal level, certain gifts and campaign contributions are not considered bribes and do not draw prosecution unless they can be linked to evidence of undue influence. In this regard, negative public perception of private contributions to elected officials as payola has caused most states to establish legislative ethics committees to review the public-private relationships of house and senate members. Furthermore, both houses of the U.S. Congress passed legislation in 1994 restricting gifts to no more than $20 in value. The Supreme Court further clarified the law by setting standards for federal bribery statutes in United States v. Sun Diamond Growers, 526 U.S. 398, 119 S.Ct. 1402, 143 L.Ed.2d 576 (1999). This case grew out of the prosecution of Mike Espy, secretary of agriculture in the Clinton administration, for allegedly accepting bribes. After Espy was acquitted of all charges, the Independent Counsel charged Sun Diamond Growers, a trade association for a large agricultural cooperative, with violating a federal gratuities law that prohibits giving gifts to public officials in exchange for favorable government actions. After Sun Diamond was convicted of the charges it took its case to the Supreme Court. The Court concluded that a person did not violate the law merely by giving a gift to a public official. Prosecutors must show that there was a connection between a specific official act in the past or future and the gift. Justice Antonin Scalia noted that if the government did not have to prove this linkage then a token gift such as the presentation of a sports jersey by a championship team to the president could be regarded as a criminal act. The Court also noted differences in various federal bribery statutes, which included broad prohibitions. In the present case, the language of the gratuities statute did not reveal a similar intent by Congress; instead, the Court viewed this law as one strand of a complicated web of laws and regulations addressing official behavior. It is common for both the recipient and the provider of a bribe to be accused, although bribery is not a joint offense—that is, one person's guilt does not affect the other's. Such was the case when a popular Massachusetts state senator allegedly accepted monthly payments from an investment Broker in exchange for trying to persuade state officials to send state Pension business to the broker. The legislator and the broker were both indicted on misdemeanor charges in early 1995. U.S. companies that engage in international bribery can become targets of investigation at home. In January 1995, a former sales director of Lockheed Corporation pleaded guilty to violating the federal Foreign Corrupt Practices Act, 15 U.S.C. § 78dd-1 et seq., Allen R. Love told a U.S. district court that he had paid and helped to cover up a bribe to an Egyptian politician for arranging Egypt's 1989 purchase of three Lockheed transport planes. Congress adopted the Foreign Corrupt Practices Act in 1977 to outlaw payments that are intended to win contracts from foreign officials. Ironically, the law's passage was triggered by testimony from a former vice president of the same Lockheed Corporation at a U.S. congressional hearing in 1976. In that case, the company's vice president admitted to bribing the prime minister of Japan with more than $1.9 million in the early 1970s, so that Japan would buy Lockheed's TriStar wide-body jets. The severity of bribery can reach the felony level, punishable by a fine or imprisonment, or both. However, charges are sometimes reduced in exchange for helping to convict accomplices. For instance, in June 1994, Love pleaded innocent to felony charges of bribery and conspiracy. Later, he pleaded guilty to one misdemeanor count of "indirectly" conspiring, as part of a plea agreement in which he agreed to testify against the corporation itself, which was also a defendant. The international sports community was rocked by a bribery scandal involving the 2002 Winter Olympic Games in Salt Lake City, Utah. Two officials of the Utah committee that secured the games were indicted in 2000 on charges of wire and Mail Fraud, conspiracy, and interstate travel in aid of Racketeering. They were charged with paying an official of the U.S. Olympic Committee (USOC) to help influence the selection of Salt Lake City by the International Olympic Committee (IOC). The USOC official who received the bribes later pleaded guilty to several criminal charges including the accepting of a bribe. Federal prosecutors contended that the two officials had paid $1 million to influence votes of several IOC members. In addition, they had allegedly diverted some $130,000 of the bid committee's income, and had altered books and created false contracts to conceal their actions. The two officials denied that they had done anything wrong, contending that the payments were intended as grants and scholarships for poor athletes. Following the indictments, ten members of the IOC either resigned or were expelled from the organization, and many reforms were undertaken to prevent bribery. The USOC also authorized an independent review of its practices. However, the two Utah officials successfully challenged the bribery charges. In July 2001, a federal judge dismissed the bribery charges, finding that a Utah bribery statute could not be applied to the defendants' actions. In December 2001, the judge dismissed the remaining criminal counts. Further readings McChesney, Fred S. 1997. Money for Nothing: Politicians, Rent Extraction, and Political Extortion. Cambridge, Mass.: Univ of Harvard Press. Noonan, John Thomas. 1984. Bribes. New York: Macmillan. PBS: Online NewsHour. February 11, 1999. "IOC: Cleaning House." Available online at <www.pbs.org/newshour/bb/sports/jan-june99/olympics_2-11.html> (accessed June 6, 2003). briberyn. the crime of giving or taking money or some other valuable item in order to influence a public official (any governmental employee) in the performance of his/her duties. Bribery includes paying to get government contracts (cutting the roads commissioner in for a secret percentage of the profit), giving a bottle of liquor to a building inspector to ignore a violation or grant a permit, or selling stock to a Congressman at a cut-rate price. Example: Governor (later Vice President) Spiro T. Agnew received five cents from the concessionaire for each pack of cigarettes sold in the Maryland capitol building. The definition has been expanded to include bribes given to corporate officials to obtain contracts or other advantages which are against company policy. BRIBERY, crim. law. The receiving or offering any undue reward by or to any person whomsoever, whose ordinary profession or business relates to the administration of public justice, in order to influence his behaviour in office, and to incline him to act contrary to his duty and the known rules of honesty and integrity. 3 Inst. 149; 1 Hawk. P. C. 67, s. 2 4 Bl. Com. 139; 1 Russ. Cr. 156. 2. The term bribery extends now further, and includes the offence of giving a bribe to many other officers. The offence of the giver and of the receiver of the bribe has the same name. For the sake of distinction, that of the former, viz : the briber, might be properly denominated active. bribery; while that of the latter, viz : the person bribed, might be called passive bribery. 3. Bribery at elections for members of parliament, has always been a crime at common law, and punishable by indictment or information. It still remains so in England notwithstanding the stat. 24 Geo. H. c. 14 3 Burr. 1340, 1589. To constitute the offence, it is not necessary that the person bribed should, in fact, vote as solicited to do 3 Burr. 1236; or even that he should have a right to vote at all both are entirely immaterial. 3 Bur. 1590-1. 4. An attempt to bribe, though unsuccessful, has been holden to be criminal, and the offender may be indicted. 2 Dall. 384; 4 Burr. 2500 3 Inst. 147; 2 Campb. R. 229; 2 Wash. 88; 1 Virg. Cas. 138; 2 Virg. Cas. 460. FinancialSeeBribebribery
Synonyms for briberynoun corruptionSynonyms- corruption
- graft
- inducement
- buying off
- payola
- crookedness
- palm-greasing
- subornation
Synonyms for briberynoun the practice of offering something (usually money) in order to gain an illicit advantageSynonymsRelated Words- felony
- barratry
- commercial bribery
|