Duff's device
Duff's device
register n = (count + 7) / 8; /* count > 0 assumed */
switch (count % 8) case 0: do { *to = *from++; case 7: *to = *from++; case 6: *to = *from++; case 5: *to = *from++; case 4: *to = *from++; case 3: *to = *from++; case 2: *to = *from++; case 1: *to = *from++; while (--n > 0);}
Shocking though it appears to all who encounter it for thefirst time, the device is actually perfectly valid, legal C.C's default fall through in case statements has long beenits most controversial single feature; Duff observed that"This code forms some sort of argument in that debate, but I'mnot sure whether it's for or against."
[For maximal obscurity, the outermost pair of braces abovecould be actually be removed - GLS]