vel nonphr.

Brit.

/ˌvɛl ˈnɒn/, U.S.

/ˌvɛl ˈnɑn/

Etymology: Latin, = ‘or not’. Originally only in the Law Latin phrase devisavit vel non, used to query the validity of a will.

Law (chiefly U.S.).

Or not; or the lack thereof; frequently appended to the name of a condition or state regarding which there is uncertainty, or to indicate that the preceding noun should be taken as including its opposite as an alternative. (Often regarded as superfluous.)

ΘΚΠ

society > law > jurisprudence > jurisprudence [phrase] > or not

vel non1895

1895 Federal Reporter 67 528 There was sufficient evidence as to negligence vel non on the part of the defendant..to require the case to be sent to the jury.

1931 Federal Reporter 2nd Ser. 51 12/2 Citizenship..being..one of the factors in determining the question of permanent residence vel non within the state.

1951 Law Rep. King's Bench Div. II. 554 Reasonable foresight of possible injury is the true criterion where negligence vel non is the issue.

1980 Human Life Rev. 6 57 The constitutionality vel non of the Hyde Amendment.

This entry has not yet been fully updated (first published 1993; most recently modified version published online December 2021).

单词	vel non
释义	vel nonphr. Brit. /ˌvɛl ˈnɒn/, U.S. /ˌvɛl ˈnɑn/ Etymology: Latin, = ‘or not’. Originally only in the Law Latin phrase devisavit vel non, used to query the validity of a will. Law (chiefly U.S.). Or not; or the lack thereof; frequently appended to the name of a condition or state regarding which there is uncertainty, or to indicate that the preceding noun should be taken as including its opposite as an alternative. (Often regarded as superfluous.) ΘΚΠ society > law > jurisprudence > jurisprudence [phrase] > or not vel non1895 1895 Federal Reporter 67 528 There was sufficient evidence as to negligence vel non on the part of the defendant..to require the case to be sent to the jury. 1931 Federal Reporter 2nd Ser. 51 12/2 Citizenship..being..one of the factors in determining the question of permanent residence vel non within the state. 1951 Law Rep. King's Bench Div. II. 554 Reasonable foresight of possible injury is the true criterion where negligence vel non is the issue. 1980 Human Life Rev. 6 57 The constitutionality vel non of the Hyde Amendment. This entry has not yet been fully updated (first published 1993; most recently modified version published online December 2021). < phr.1895
随便看	θ171083 θ171084 θ171085 θ171086 θ171087 θ171088 θ171089 θ17109 θ171090 θ171091 θ171092 θ171093 θ171094 θ171095 θ171096 θ171097 θ171098 θ171099 θ1711 θ17110 θ171100 θ171101 θ171102 θ171103 θ171104